Greetings,
I apologize for not blogging sooner (getting over a nasty sore throat/cold). I am still working on the application series, planning to get that started on or before August 1, 2010.
Numerical Approximations
In the meantime, I am also reading about a series of numerical analysis by Namir Shammas. Please click here to go to his web page. . I am really fascinated about his paper on integration methods and polynomials he uses to better fit data.
There is also a paper on inverse distribution which can come in handy for those in statistics and probability. For example, the inverse normal distribution lets you find the zpoint given the α, the level of significance. So, if the given area under the normal curve is .95, α = .05.
Is There an Exact Value for π? One Man Thinks So (He Isn't Correct)
There is this mathematician from India who claimed to have found an exact value for π, which the claimed value was well off from the true value of 3.14159265359... (off by at least .005). The way he found his value for π was by a Sieve method, which was a very confusing method involving dissecting an circle inscribed in a square, and balancing areas of circular sectors inside and outside the inscribed circle. Problem was he made an assumed value for π to conclude some convenient number. I did not get into his other two methods.
Here is the article where the errors are posted, published by Acme Science, a blog authored by Samuel Hansen (Twitter: @Samuel_Hansen): please click here.
I hope your days are well and without sickness. You can follow me on Twitter: @edward_shore. Until next time,
Eddie
A blog is that is all about mathematics and calculators, two of my passions in life.
Monday, July 23, 2012
Numerical Approximations and Debunking the Claim that π has an exact value
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Curve Fitting: Fitting to the Curve y = a*e^(b*x^2)
Curve Fitting: Fitting to the Curve y = a*e^(b*x^2) Introduction This blog is to fit data to the equation y = a*e^(b*x^2). A f...

Casio fx991EX Classwiz Review Casio FX991EX The next incarnation of the fx991 line of Casio calculators is the fx991 EX. ...

One of the missing features of the TI82/83/84 family is the ability to convert between bases. Here are two programs in TIBasic to help...

TI36X Pro Review This is a review of the TI36X Pro Calculator by Texas Instruments. History Originally, this was the TI30X Pro that w...
I forget where I read about it, but someone wrote a program to generate simple fractions (like the famous 22/7 one) that give values close to π. He found that the number of significant digits in the fraction was the same, +/ 1, as the number of *correct* digits in the π approxomation. So, 22/7 with its 2 significant digits, is one of the better approximations, giving one more digit of π than goes into it.
ReplyDeleteThe main point I got from this is that there still ain't no free lunch. There may be some solid numbertheoretical reason for this.